Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Bell v. Samuels et al
as 5:2008cv00613
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Bell
Defendant:
Douglas Samuels and J Mitchell Holmes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Gwin
as 4:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
Earl Holmes, III
Defendant:
Sharon P Gwin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Gerald Holmes and Gerald Holmes
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01005
Estate Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Andrews et al v. Holmes et al
as 4:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Nancy M Rothschild, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Jerome A Holmes, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bailey v. Ramey et al
as 4:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lamarr Bailey
Defendant:
Jay K Ramey, Nalani Ching, Sharon Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hussein v. Duncan Regional Hospital Inc et al
as 5:2007cv00439
Plaintiff:
Basem M Hussein and Basem M Hussein
Defendant:
Duncan Regional Hospital Inc, Duncan Regional Hospital Inc, Duncan Regional Hospital Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
Duncan Regional Hospital Inc, Duncan Regional Hospital Inc and Duncan Regional Hospital Inc
Counter Defendant:
Basem M Hussein and Basem M Hussein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Andrews et al v. Panter et al
as 4:2007cv00200
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Rodney Class, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Deanell Recca Tacha, Jerry Lee Andrews, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stinson v. Maynard et al
as 5:2007cv00387
Plaintiff:
Naomi A Stinson
Defendant:
Allison Maynard, Angela Martin, Bill O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
