Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Raiola v. Werner Co. et al
as 2:2014cv01008
Defendant:
Home Depot, USA, Inc and Werner Co.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raiola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Fe Galanto v. Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00913
Plaintiff:
Liza Fe Galanto
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Nobriga v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2014cv00271
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nobriga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Spencer-Ross v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00185
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Regina Spencer-Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Laroux v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2012cv00299
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lavon D. Laroux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00621
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NOT USED
as 2:2011cv01874
Plaintiff:
Marla Bertrand
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Marla Bertrand v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2011cv00843
Plaintiff:
Marla Bertrand
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bobadilla et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., et al.
as 2:2007cv00344
Defendant:
Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., SLR, Inc., Aerofil Technology, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Teaford, Jose Polanco, David Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.