Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 51 - 60 of 215
Mitchell v. Crickmar et al
as 4:2015cv00104
Plaintiff: Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant: Crickmar, Michael Moore, Illa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMPHREY v. MORALES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00232
Petitioner: BRANDIN HUMPHREY
Respondent: JOSE MORALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Humphrey
as 1:2015cv01814
Plaintiff: Robert C. Evans, Jr.
Defendant: Kenneth Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Humphrey v. Douglas County Officers / Appointed Counsel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01630
Plaintiff: Cedric Timothy Humphrey
Defendant: Douglas County Officers / Appointed Counsel, William Gray, Bryan Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southern Mutual Church Insurance Company v. Zion Baptist Church of Braselton, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00071
Plaintiff: Southern Mutual Church Insurance Company
Defendant: Zion Baptist Church of Braselton, Inc., Joshua Humphrey and Austin Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Humphrey v. Nationstar Mortgage
as 1:2015cv00937
Plaintiff: Kenneth Humphrey
Defendant: Nationstar Mortgage and Robert C. Evans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
HUMPHREY v. HEAD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00073
Plaintiff: JOSHUA HUMPHREY
Defendant: FREDRICK HEAD and MARLON GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Crickmar et al
as 4:2015cv00037
Plaintiff: Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant: Crickmar, Michael Moore, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHATMAN v. HUMPHREY
as 4:2015cv00012
Plaintiff: KYJUANE L CHATMAN
Defendant: ALLEN HUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CHATMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00002
Plaintiff: HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: BRUCE CHATMAN, WILLIAM POWELL, JUNE BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?