Cases
Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Hogue et al v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff: Brian Elliott Hogue, Gary A Butts, Gerald E Lind and others
Defendant: Corizon Health Services, LLC, Beeken Petty O'Keefe & Company, PharmaCorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Yordy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00529
Plaintiff: Jerry W. Campbell
Defendant: Keith Yordy, Blair, Corizon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sykes v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2014cv00057
Plaintiff: Todd D Sykes
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services and Idaho Board of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stearns v. Wengler et al
as 1:2013cv00019
Petitioner: Stacy Warren Stearns
Respondent: Tim Wengler, Idaho Board of Correction and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The Associated Press, et al v. C.L. Otter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-35456
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, a New York corporation, IDAHO STATESMAN PUBLISHING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as The Idaho Statesman, LEE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation doing business as The Times-News and others
Defendant - Appellee: C.L. "BUTCH" OTTER, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of Idaho, ROBIN SANDY, in her official capacity as the Idaho Board of Corrections, HOWARD G. "J.R." VAN TASSEL, in his official capacity as the Idaho Board of Correction and others
Abbott et al v. Wasden et al
as 1:2012cv00044
Plaintiff: Dennis E Abbott, Louis Cunningham and Joseph Stanka
Defendant: Lawrence Wasden, Jill Whittington, Idaho Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lerajjareanra Kelly v. Jeffery Zmuda, et al
as 10-35782
Plaintiff - Appellant: LERAJJAREANRA O. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee: JEFFERY D. ZMUDA, BRENT REINKE, PAM SONNEN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?