Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00173
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02430
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00146
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fugon v. Immigration Custom Enforcement et al
as 6:2009cv00218
Petitioner:
Luis Hector Fugon
Respondent:
Immigration Custom Enforcement and Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miranda v. Immigration Customs Enforcement et al
as 6:2009cv00136
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Miranda
Respondent:
Immigration Customs Enforcement and Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reynoso v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)
as 5:2009cv00003
Petitioner:
Percio Antonio Reynoso
Respondent:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01808
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
