Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 189
Runion v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00957
Petitioner: Stanley Jay Runion
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Arntsen v. State of Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv05511
Defendant: Department of Corrections - SCCC, State of Washington, Clallam Bay Corrections Center and others
Plaintiff: Ricky M Arntsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Engberg v. Bennett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00888
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Petitioner: Shane R Engberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gossett v. Bennett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv05491
Petitioner: Mark J Gossett
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Colbert v. Bennett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00889
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Petitioner: Bobby Darrell Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gossett v. Bennett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv05501
Petitioner: Mark J Gossett
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Corbray v. Bennett
as 24-3822
Petitioner: DENNIS DERISE CORBRAY
Respondent: JASON BENNETT
Valdez v. Bennett
as 24-3780
Petitioner: SAMUEL F. VALDEZ
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Gossett v. Bennett
as 24-3788
Petitioner: MARK J. GOSSETT
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Serrano v. Bennett
as 24-3783
Petitioner: RAMIL A. SERRANO
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?