Cases 51 - 60 of 61
USA v. Yong Li
as 10-10079
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
YONG JUN LI
LIN v. GREEN BROOK NAILS, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv05597
Plaintiff:
CHUNFANG LIN
Defendant:
GREEN BROOK NAILS, LLC, JASON LI, HAIXIA ZU and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv09028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Microsoft Corporation v. Li et al
as 3:2008cv05128
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Jun Li, Gong Qi and Jingtao Jin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-55580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff-intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-55195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus - Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv08292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Blue Creek Produce, LLC v. Big City Produce, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv07849
Plaintiff:
Blue Creek Produce, LLC
Defendant:
Big City Produce, Inc., Mauricio Rodriguez, Stanley Forrest and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
