Cases 51 - 60 of 1,291
Pierce v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2023cv01072
Petitioner:
Sidney-James T. Pierce
Respondent:
State of Delaware and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shumacher v. Leproust et al
as 1:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Leo Shumacher
Defendant:
Emily Leproust, Robert Chess, Nelson C. Chan and others
Nominal Defendant:
Twist Bioscience Corporation
Vallieres v. Levchin et al
as 1:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Michael Vallieres
Defendant:
Max Levchin, Jeremy Liew, Libor Michalek and others
Nominal Defendant:
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
Mills v. Bayhealth Medical Center
as 1:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
James Mills
Defendant:
Bayhealth Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Kent et al v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Bilal Zuberi and others
Abramowski et al v. Nuvei Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Pawneet Abramowski, Amanda Abrams, AG Mortgage Value Partners Master Fund, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Nuvei Corporation and Pinnacle Merger Sub, Inc.
Philips v. Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P., Walter R. Arnheim, Lori A. Gobillot and others
Washington v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
Eugenia L. Washington
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
James v. Connolly et al
as 1:2023cv00914
Plaintiff:
Sharon M. James
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly and John Cerino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Chrustowski v. Cheeks et al
as 1:2023cv00887
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
Rudina M. Cheeks, Stephanie L. Ford, James Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
