Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 86
James Runyon v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 12-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES R. RUNYON
Defendant - Appellee: CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of the Delaware Department of Corrections, PERRY PHELPS, DAVID PIERCE and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Runyon v. Danberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00002
Plaintiff: James R. Runyon
Defendant: Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Gill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01029
Plaintiff: Thomas Gordon
Defendant: George Gill, Michael Deppe and James Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Zeobouty
as 11-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: ZEOBOUTY, GORDON, CHELSIA HICKS and others
Debtor - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER CESSNA
James Biggins v. Green
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: GREEN, Sergeant, KIESSER, TELB and others
Debtor - Appellee: CANDY DIBBLE
Biggins v. Zeobouty et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00662
Plaintiff: James Arthur Biggins
Defendant: Zeobouty, Gordon, Chelsia Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff: James Arthur Biggins
Defendant: Green, Kiesser, Telb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Little et al
as 1:2011cv00478
Plaintiff: James Arthur Biggins
Defendant: Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. Little et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00411
Plaintiff: Gary E. Thorpe
Defendant: Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?