Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Robert Scott v. ZST Digital Networks, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03531
Defendant:
Zhong Bo, John Chen, Zhong Lin and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. Kiat et al
as 1:2010cv06456
Defendant:
Zheng Minli, John Chen, Qiang Chen and others
Plaintiff:
PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Zhang v. Chen
as 1:2010cv04655
Plaintiff:
Feng Lan Zhang
Defendant:
John Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Beavers et al v. Phillips et al
as 3:2010cv00901
Defendant:
Andrew Phillips, Andrew Phillips, Andrew Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Betty L. Beavers, Betty L. Beavers, Betty L. Beavers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Chatman v. Tyner, et al
as 1:2003cv06636
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
C Tyner , - Alameida, K W Prunty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feuer v. Thompson et al
as 4:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
J. N. Feuer
Defendant:
G. Kennedy Thompson, Thomas J. Wurtz, Herbert M. Sandler and others
Miscellaneou:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Feuer v. Thompson et al
as 3:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
J. N. Feuer, J. N. Feuer, J. N. Feuer and others
Defendant:
G. Kennedy Thompson, Thomas J. Wurtz, Herbert M. Sandler and others
Miscellaneou:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Charles Chatman v. Richard Early, et al
as 09-15683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD EARLY, Regional Administrator, JOHN CHEN, Chief Deputy Inspector General, M. MONTEIRO, Associate Warden and others
David Arisman v. J. Woodford, et al
as 09-15637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. ARISMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. S. WOODFORD, Warden, GRAY DAVIS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Chatman v. Early
as 3:2003cv02820
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman
Defendant:
Richard Early, John Chen , M. Monteiro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
