Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Painter v. Komadina et al
as 1:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael Painter
Defendant:
Kevin A. Komadina and The Obessesion Group, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Geico Indemnity Company et al v. Portillo et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Company and Geico Casualty Company
Defendant:
Markryan Portillo, Jaime Portillo, Gerald Buckey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank v. Veach
as 1:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
Kevin H. Frank
Defendant:
R. Veach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. ATHNA Technical Services Inc. et al
as 3:2011mc00031
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eric Scott
Defendant:
ATHNA Technical Services Inc. and Meg Arminsky
Rudolph et al v. Campbell et al
as 3:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
Harold Frederick Rudolph, Sr. , Gerald Gugel, Jr. , April J. Pugh and others
Defendant:
Craig Campbell and State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Rudolph et al v. Fenumiai
as 3:2010cv00243
Plaintiff:
Harold F. Rudolph, Sr , Greg Pugh , April Pugh and others
Defendant:
Gail Fenumiai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Scott v. ATHNA Technical Services Inc. et al
as 3:2010mc00057
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eric Scott
Defendant:
ATHNA Technical Services Inc. and Meg Arminsky
Mullinax v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mullinax
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pease v. Veach
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Pease
Defendant:
R. V. Veach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dozier-Carter v. Hostler et al
as 3:2010cv00174
Plaintiff:
Angela Maria Dozier-Carter
Defendant:
Kevin Hostler and Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.