Cases 51 - 60 of 260
Travis D. Arnold et al v. M. Rios et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Arnold, K. Oshiro, Sen. Ofcr. Danny Long and Spouse and others
Defendant:
Ms. M. Rios, B. Lammer, Lt. M. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lammers v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08328
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lammers
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Norman v. Lammer
as 4:2022cv02927
Petitioner:
Ronald Ray Norman
Respondent:
Warden Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LAMMERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13648
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEE LAMMERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Rosenthal et al
as 4:2022cv02659
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Lee H Rosenthal, District Judge Keith P Ellison, US District Judge Lynn N Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman Wyatt v. Warden B. Lammer
as 2:2022cv05170
Petitioner:
Thurman Wyatt
Respondent:
Warden B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michael Deon Thompson v. Lammer
as 2:2022cv04861
Petitioner:
Michael Deon Thompson
Respondent:
Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Marcellus R. Freeman v. B. Lammer et al
as 5:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Marcellus R. Freeman
Defendant:
B. Lammer, AW Stickles, LT. D. Woody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Travis D. Arnold v. B. Lammer et al
as 2:2022cv03894
Petitioner:
Travis D. Arnold
Respondent:
Complex Warden B. Lammer and A. W. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
