Cases 51 - 60 of 259
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00002
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
City of East Point, Georgia v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
as 1:2020cv04916
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Jimaris L. Davis, City of East Point, Georgia, Wendy Mack and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MERCER ET AL v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO FRO-102202-18
as 7:2020cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES MERCER and PATRICIA MERCER
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO FRO-102202-18
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roberts v. Philadelphia Express Trust et al
as 4:2020cv00236
Defendant:
Marine Transport Management, John Doe, Philadelphia Express Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gilkes v. Philadelphia Express Trust et al
as 4:2020cv00235
Defendant:
Marine Transport Management, Hapag-LLoyd USA, Philadelphia Express Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Lester Gilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cosme et al v. Messer Financial Group Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03950
Defendant:
William Lloyd Rice and Messer Financial Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cosme Services, LLC and Gerardo Cosme
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
LLOYD v. BUTLER et al
as 7:2020cv00132
Defendant:
Officer GIBSON and Officer BUTLER
Plaintiff:
DIVANTE LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. TATOM et al
as 5:2020cv00275
Defendant:
MARTIN, PIMUS, TATOM and others
Plaintiff:
DIVANTE LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00150
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2020cv02118
Defendant:
Hon. Brian Kemp and Brad Raffensperger
Plaintiff:
Deborah Gonzalez, April Boyer Brown, Linda Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
