Cases filed in Florida
Cases 51 - 60 of 64
TEAL v. SPEARS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00456
Plaintiff: ERIC LAMONT TEAL
Defendant: DUANE SPEARS, JOHN DOE, MARY PLISKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. 1st American Storage Co., Inc.
as 8:2012cv01661
Plaintiff: Lundy J. Dukes
Defendant: 1st American Storage Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00592
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Project Return Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv02605
Plaintiff: Lundy J. Dukes
Defendant: Project Return Inc., Natalie M Mitchels, Fred Fiedler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lundy v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv21031
Plaintiff: Norris Lundy
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Boatman v. Madan et al
as 3:2011cv00072
Plaintiff: Rayvon Boatman
Defendant: Elio Madan, P Gudino, Victor Selyutin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Rath et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv01109
Plaintiff: Lundy J. Dukes
Defendant: Fred Rath, Fred Rath, Jr., Candis Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lundy v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 8:2010cv00639
Plaintiff: Kathleen Lundy
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Contract Insurance
Lundy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00155
Petitioner: John H. Lundy and John H. Lundy
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nesbitt v. D. Fish Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv23160
Plaintiff: Alexis Nesbitt and Alexis Nesbitt
Defendant: D. Fish Express, Inc. and Danny A. Lundy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?