Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv60459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Montes et al v. M & M Management Company et al
as 9:2015cv80142
Plaintiff:
Julio Montes , Victor Rodriguez and Jose Brenes
Defendant:
M & M Management Company , Diana Alonso , Maribel Calderone and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv62586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Whetsell v. M&M Realty Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Ronald Whetsell
Defendant:
M&M Realty Solutions, LLC and Angel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SPRINGS v. GIELOW
as 3:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L SPRINGS
Defendant:
W L GIELOW, M ALLEN, A BEASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyer v. M & M Asphalt Maintenance, Inc.
as 9:2014cv80337
Plaintiff:
Carlton Dyer
Defendant:
M & M Asphalt Maintenance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Hygiene-Master DC Metro, Inc. et al v. Barnes et al
as 2:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Hygiene-Master DC Metro, Inc. , Hygiene Master Network, Inc. and Hygiene Master, LTD.
Defendant:
Joel D. Barnes , Barnes Construction Group, Inc. , James Murrell Mixson, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Letterman et al v. M&M PETROLEUM TOO, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv14052
Plaintiff:
James Letterman and Mitzi Letterman
Defendant:
M&M PETROLEUM TOO, INC. and Robert Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv23920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Daniels et al v. Glovatski et al
as 9:2012cv81130
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniels and Daniels 10 Trust
Defendant:
Alexander Glovatski, Availablenet LLC, M&M Aircraft Acquisitions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
