Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Malone v. Fred's, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Anita Malone
Defendant:
Fred's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. Good et al
as 3:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Antonio Malone
Defendant:
Rachel Good and Progressive Michigan Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Malone
as 3:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert M. Malone
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
ACE American Insurance Company v. E. Cornell Malone Corporation
as 4:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
ACE American Insurance Company
Defendant:
E. Cornell Malone Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00562
Plaintiff:
Icy Allen , All Plaintiffs , Vicki Allen and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clayton v. Tate County School District et al
as 2:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Trey Clayton
Defendant:
Tate County School District, James Malone and Jerome Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Scott Matthew Malone
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Malone v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00034
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc. , Dollar General Partners , Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Malone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Malone v. Ringer & Lingold and Copiah Bank NA
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Earnest Malone
Defendant:
Ringer & Lingold and Copiah Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Beamer et al v. Patriot Homes of Texas, LP et al
as 1:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ruby Lee Beamer, Carl J. Beschen, Lattimore V. Brown and others
Defendant:
Patriot Homes of Texas, LP, Patriot Homes, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
