Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Harris-Darden et al v. South Florida Federal Credit Union et al
as 1:2013cv23213
Plaintiff:
Tanishal Harris-Darden and Christine Redmond
Defendant:
South Florida Federal Credit Union and Maggie Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Svetlick et al v. K.S. Geisler, Inc.
as 0:2012cv61739
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick , John Loveless , James Boylan and others
Defendant:
K.S. Geisler, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Svetlick et al v. WLM Electric, Inc.
as 0:2012cv61337
Defendant:
WLM Electric, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick , John Loveless , James Boylan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Williams v. Parker et al
as 6:2012cv00789
Plaintiff:
Josiah Williams
Defendant:
Jack Parker, Officer Bradshaw, Sgt. Maggie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2012cv00452
Plaintiff:
Maggie Velez Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kennedy et al v. Geronemus, Trustee et al
as 0:2012cv60414
Plaintiff:
Maggie Kennedy , Toby Johnson and Leslie Chadwick
Defendant:
Richard Geronemus, Trustee , Richard Geronemus, DDS Profit Sharing Plan and G & C Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Svetlick et al v. Green Electric, Inc.
as 0:2011cv62702
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick , John Loveless , James Boylan and others
Defendant:
Green Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
