Cases 51 - 60 of 288
Mullis v. Moore
as 3:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Justin Mullis
Defendant:
Rick Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. Moore
as 2:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Angela Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01453
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01375
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon et al v. Salkoff et al
as 2:2022cv01197
Plaintiff:
S. Seanah Dixon and Toney A. White
Defendant:
S Salkoff, Terrence Jackson, Ernesto Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Picozzi v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01011
Defendant:
Julie Matousek, Danyele Sipes, State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept. et al
as 2:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
James E. Bates
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept., Det. B. Moore, Det. A. Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
