Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Neal v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
as 2:2012cv01352
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Richard Leland Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Arsenal, Inc. v. Neal
as 2:2011cv01628
Plaintiff:
Arsenal, Inc.
Defendant:
Adam Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PFResources, LLC v. American Blackhorse Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01554
Defendant:
American Blackhorse Holdings, LLC, Jason Andrade, Jason Andrade and others
Plaintiff:
PFResources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Patricia Neale Watson vs. Las Vegas Valley Water District
as 2:2000cv01338
Defendant:
Las Vegas Valley Water District
Plaintiff:
Patricia Neale Watson
Cause Of Action: Title VII
Phillip et al v. Qualified West, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01856
Defendant:
Banc America Corporation and Qualified West, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ly T. Phillip and Neal J. Phillip, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01814
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Neal et al v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2009cv01944
Plaintiff:
Richard Leland Neal and Rex Carl Sagely
Defendant:
State of Arizona, Robert Devries, Tom Sheahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Michael v. Bannister
as 2:2009cv01592
Plaintiff:
Robert Neal Michael
Defendant:
Dr. R.B. Bannister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
