Cases 51 - 60 of 418
Benn v. Neal
as 1:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Joseph Benjamin Benn
Defendant:
Diane Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06292
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06273
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Regels v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Neal Regels
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
William v. RedBox Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05585
Plaintiff:
Chad William
Defendant:
RedBox Entertainment, Inc., Galen C. Smith, Gregory W. Frenzel and others
Whitfield v. Redbox Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05613
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Redbox Entertainment, Inc., Galen C. Smith, Gregory W. Frenzel and others
Sexton v. Redbox Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05266
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sexton
Defendant:
Redbox Entertainment, Inc., Gregory W. Frenzel, Neal P. Goldman and others
Lahood v. Oprihory et al
as 1:2022cv05236
Plaintiff:
George Lahood
Defendant:
Francene Oprihory, Amen Atelek, Elizabeth Broderick-Oprihory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
The Phoenix of Albany, LLC v. The County of Albany et al
as 1:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
The Phoenix of Albany, LLC
Defendant:
The County of Albany and Jeffrey Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez et al v. HIRA Associates New York LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03101
Plaintiff:
Francisco Martinez and Maximino Martinez
Defendant:
HIRA Associates New York LLC d/b/a Bael Wagon & Taco Town, Neal Patel and HIRA Associates New York LLC doing business as Bagel Wagon & Taco Town
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
