Cases 51 - 60 of 130
Neal v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28267
Plaintiff:
Donna Neal
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nixon et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27775
Plaintiff:
Chrystal Nixon and Neal Nixon, II
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26450
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Neal
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv25397
Plaintiff:
Dennis Neal Horton
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Neal v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25149
Plaintiff:
Sandra Neal
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Skaar et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv25033
Plaintiff:
Jean M. Skaar and Neal Skaar
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moats v. West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways et al
as 1:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moats, Sr.
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, Paul Mattox, Jr., Raymond Duke Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neal et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv23312
Plaintiff:
Christina Renne Neal and Anthony Neal
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22396
Plaintiff:
Jane Neal
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Neal et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv19772
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth O'Neal and Calvin O'Neal
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
