Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Smith v. Ayers
as 3:2007cv05425
Plaintiff:
Rick P. Smith
Defendant:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv05152
Plaintiff:
Paul Holman, Paul Holman, Paul Holman and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Apple, Inc., Apple, Inc. and others
3rd Party Defendant:
Timothy P. Smith, Timothy P. Smith and Timothy P. Smith
Movant:
Herbert H. Kliegerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv04741
Plaintiff:
Patricia D. Smith and James P. Smith
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corporation and G.D. Searle LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shamburger v. Kirkland et al
as 3:2007cv04597
Plaintiff:
Harold B. Shamburger
Defendant:
R. Kirkland, T. Jourden, G. Ater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Perry et al
as 3:2007cv04439
Plaintiff:
Rick P. Smith
Defendant:
A. Perry, England and Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hutton et al
as 3:2007cv04437
Plaintiff:
Rick P. Smith
Defendant:
Hutton, A. Perry, W. Engelstad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Perry et al
as 3:2007cv04440
Plaintiff:
Rick P. Smith
Defendant:
A. Perry, Hutton, Griggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dawson et al
as 3:2007cv04438
Plaintiff:
Ricky P. Smith
Defendant:
James F. Dawson and Martinez Detention Facility Law Library
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Perry et al
as 3:2007cv03142
Plaintiff:
Ricky P. Smith
Defendant:
A. Perry and England
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Perry
as 3:2007cv03045
Plaintiff:
Ricky P. Smith
Defendant:
A. Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
