Cases 51 - 60 of 211
Keith Jackson v. Patrick Murphy, et al
as 20-2062
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA SCHNEIDER, formerly known as SARA KROPP, PATRICK MURPHY, Doctor, JUDY SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH JACKSON
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27362
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27356
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10518
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01800
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baldwin v. Sheehan et al
as 2:2020cv00359
Defendant:
Dr. Ronald Solorzano, Aaron Sheehan, Michelle Schouest and others
Plaintiff:
John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91038
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67010
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01770
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Clint Fisher v. Marina Secchitano, et al
as 20-35310
Defendant / Appellee:
MARINA SECCHITANO, ROBERT ESTRADA, ALICE NG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINT FISHER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
