Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Clarke P. Paxton et al v. American Commonwealth et al
as 2:2010cv08614
Defendant:
American Commonwealth, David Cabral, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Lynn E. Behrens and Clarke P. Paxton
USA v. Public Storage Unit B225, 13300 Paxton Ave., Pacoima, California 91331
as 2:2010mj02045
Defendant:
Public Storage Unit B225, 13300 Paxton Ave., Pacoima, California 91331 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Public Storage Unit B225, 13300 Paxton Ave., Pacoima, California 91331
as 2:2010mj02045
Defendant:
Public Storage Unit B225, 13300 Paxton Ave., Pacoima, California 91331 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Marquez v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2009at01684
Plaintiff:
Carlos Marquez
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, Reginald Chappelle, Brian Hagler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marquez v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2009cv02925
Plaintiff:
Carlos Marquez
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, Reginald Chappelle, Brian Hagler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01474
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Johnnie Paxton et al v. City of Montebello et al
as 2:2009cv03691
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Paxton, Johnnie Paxton, Brandon Contreras and others
Defendant:
City of Montebello, City of Montebello and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at01429
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02874
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
