Cases 51 - 60 of 825
Phillips v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Gerald K. Phillips, Jerry Phillips and Jerry Kenneth Phillips
Defendant:
Gerald George Phillips, Edwin Vargas, Michael Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnow v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Ryan Garnow
Defendant:
Sergeant Andrew Jones, Sergeant Devon Phillips, Correctional Officer T. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Phillips
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Liening v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Phillip Liening
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Upton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Phillip Upton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00751
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Phillips
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Phillips
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brandemihl v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Phillip Brandemihl
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shafer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Phillip Shafer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS PHILLIPS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
