Cases 51 - 60 of 75
PlainsCapital Bank
as 5:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
PlainsCapital Bank
Defendant:
Mission Cattle LLC, Roberts Enterprises Inc. and Marvin P Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Oxford Health Plans, Inc. v. Sagebrush Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01681
Plaintiff:
Oxford Health Plans, Inc.
Defendant:
Sagebrush Solutions, LLC
Garnishee:
PlainsCapital Bank and RG Consolidated Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Wolf Run Hollow, LLC v. Herring Bank et al
as 3:2010cv00458
Plaintiff:
Wolf Run Hollow, LLC and Wolf Run Hollow, LLC
Defendant:
Herring Bank, American State Bank, Benchmark Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
PlainsCapital Bank v. Hillary Machinery, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00653
Plaintiff:
PlainsCapital Bank
Defendant:
Hillary Machinery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, et al v. Stayton SW Assisted Living, L., et al
as 09-36159
:
In the Matter of: STAYTON SW ASSISTED LIVING, L.L.C.
Appellant:
THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC, PLAINSCAPITAL BANK, ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Appellee:
STAYTON SW ASSISTED LIVING, L.L.C., TENANTS IN COMMON COMMITTEE and UNSECURED CREDITORS' COMMITTEE
PlainsCapital Bank v. Mebane
as 5:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
PlainsCapital Bank
Defendant:
Dwight G Mebane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PlainsCapital Bank v. S1, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00777
Plaintiff:
PlainsCapital Bank and PlainsCapital Bank
Defendant:
S1, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PlainsCapital Bank
as 5:2009cv00227
Plaintiff:
PlainsCapital Bank
Defendant:
Dwight G Mebane, Helen Mebane and Co-Trustees of the Dwight and Helen Mebane Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
