Cases 51 - 60 of 120
McCoy v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2016cv00306
Plaintiff:
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Dayena M. Corcoran, O.I.C., M. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Roberts et al
as 1:2015cv03583
Plaintiff:
Leonard C Anderson
Defendant:
Kenrick H. Roberts, U.S. Department of Justice and B.O.P., Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Druitt et al v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 8:2015cv03180
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Druitt
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goode v. Baltimore City Circuit Court et al
as 1:2015cv02641
Plaintiff:
Abraham Goode
Defendant:
Baltimore City Circuit Court, Unknown Baltimore City Police Officers, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angelina v. Cumberland FCI Health Services et al
as 8:2015cv02427
Plaintiff:
Tello J. Angelina
Defendant:
Cumberland FCI Health Services, FBOP (Federal Bureau of Prisons), R Shook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lattisaw v. E.C.I. Prison et al
as 1:2015cv02040
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lattisaw
Defendant:
E.C.I. Prison, Wexford Medical Source, Inc., Ruth Pinkney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03827
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03417
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vaughn v. Eastern Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv02394
Plaintiff:
Donta Vaughn
Defendant:
Eastern Correctional Institution, Maryland Regional Diagnostic Classification, Dep't of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
