Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Application of Utica Mutual In v. INA Reinsurance Company
as 10-4164
Petitioner - Appellant:
Application of Utica Mutual Insurance Company, for an order pursuant to C.P.L.R. 7503 (b) Staying arbitration of a certain controversy and disqualifying Chadbourne & Parke LLP from representing INA Reinsurance Company n/k/a R&Q Reinsurance Company in the
Respondent:
Chadbourn & Parke LLP
Respondent - Appellee:
INA Reinsurance Company n/k/a R&Q Reinsurance Company
-CW Jose G Amador v. R Q Hickman
as 2:2000cv05558
Petitioner:
Jose Guadalupe Amador
Respondent:
R Q Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martiros Sarkisyan v. R. Hickman
as 10-56056
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIROS SARKISYAN
Respondent - Appellee:
R. Q. HICKMAN, Warden
Martiros Sarkisyan v. R Q Hickman
as 2:2000cv01989
Respondent:
R Q Hickman
Petitioner:
Martiros Sarkisyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todd Ashker, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-15911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER and DANNY TROXELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, R. Q. HICKMAN, EDWARD J. ALAMEIDA, Jr. and others
Application of Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Chadbourne & Parke LLP et al
as 1:2010cv02669
Petitioner:
Application of Utica Mutual Insurance Company
Respondent:
Chadbourne & Parke LLP and INA Reinsurance Company n/k/a R&Q Reinsurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Daniel Carpenter v. State of California, et al
as 10-15566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADULT & YOUTH CORRECTIONAL AGENCY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Murphy v. R Q Contruction, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00513
Plaintiff:
James P Murphy
Defendant:
R Q Construction, Inc , Continental Casualty Company and Does
Counter_claimant:
R Q Construction, Inc
Counter_defendant:
James P Murphy
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
