Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Richie v. Workman
as 08-5095
Petitioner - Appellee:
LONNIE WRIGHT RICHIE
Respondent - Appellant:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Richie v. Workman
as 08-5091
Petitioner - Appellant:
LONNIE WRIGHT RICHIE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Griffith v. Workman
as 08-6122
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY DON GRIFFITH
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden
Phillips v. Workman
as 08-7043
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST EUGENE PHILLIPS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Stick v. Workman
as 08-7022
Petitioner - Appellant:
WOODROW GENE STICK
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden
Steward v. Workman
as 07-7079
Petitioner - Appellant:
LELAND WAYNE STEWARD
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Lexington Assessment and Reception Center
Duty v. Workman
as 07-7073
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN DAVID DUTY
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Pententiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Young v. Workman
as 07-5130
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIUS RECARDO YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Matthews v. Workman
as 07-6209
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY MATTHEWS
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Hooks v. Workman
as 07-6152
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNY KEITH HOOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
