Cases 51 - 60 of 172
Dominique Roque v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 7:2017cv00470
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection and Lindsey Renee Robbins
Plaintiff:
Dominique Roque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robbins v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv01169
Petitioner:
Jacobs Joseph Robbins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robbins v. Alley et al
as 4:2017cv00980
Plaintiff:
Jerry Robbins
Defendant:
Travis Richard Alley, Donald E. Shibley, Craig S. Towson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. NDT GLOBAL, LLC
as 4:2017cv03562
Plaintiff:
Jacob Robbins
Defendant:
NDT GLOBAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arnold v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 7:2017cv00190
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds, Inc. and David Alan Robbins
Plaintiff:
Andrea Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Robbins Sr v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2017cv00507
Petitioner:
Romont L Robbins Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robbins v. Harris County District Clerk et al
as 4:2017mc01736
Plaintiff:
Vivan Robbins
Defendant:
Harris County District Clerk, Chris Daniel, Paul Coselli and others
Pellegrini et al v. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
as 4:2017cv02085
Defendant:
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pellegrini , Paschal Akuchie , Andreana Anaya and others
Pecial_master:
Alice Oliver Parrott
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Robbins v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Robbins
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Thomas Stewardson and FNU Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mantis Communications, LLC v. Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Mantis Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC and Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
