Cases 51 - 60 of 252
L.T. Thomas v. Robert Houston
as 13-2849
Petitioner - Appellant:
L.T. Thomas
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston
Jenkins v. Houston
as 4:2013cv03138
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Keylan Jenkins
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Houston
as 4:2013cv03128
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Robert E. Miller
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Castonguay, Sr. v. Robert Houston, et al
as 13-2419
Petitioner:
Paul Castonguay, Sr.
Respondent:
Robert Houston, Director, Brian Gage, Warden and Department of Correctional Services
Jaime Murillo v. Robert Houston
as 13-2267
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jaime Murillo
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston
Castonguay v. Houston et al
as 4:2013cv03105
Plaintiff:
Paul Castonguay
Defendant:
Department of Correctional Services, Brain Gage and Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castonguay v. Houston
as 4:2013cv03094
Petitioner:
Paul Castonguay
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Britten et al
as 4:2013cv03093
Respondent:
Fred Britten, Robert Houston and State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Eric Fritgerald Lewis
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson et al v. Bruning et al
as 8:2013cv00130
Defendant:
Jon Bruning, Dept of Corrections, Frank Hopkins and others
Plaintiff:
Gracy S. Sedlak and Harold B. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Houston
as 4:2013cv03084
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Eric McGee
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
