Cases 51 - 60 of 391
Compton v. Pittsylvania County Sherriffs Department et al
as 7:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Compton, Jr.
Defendant:
Pittsylvania County Sherriffs Department, Sherriff Taylor and Officer Jason Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Roger H. Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lawson v. Curn
as 7:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Lawson
Defendant:
Larry Curn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hardman v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Derell Quamedrus Hardman
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director of USCIS Debora Rogers and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Lawson v. Sneed
as 7:2021cv00644
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Lawson
Defendant:
Alicia Sneed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooke v. CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation et al
as 1:2021cv01401
Defendant:
Ryan Denise Estes, Cathy Korell, CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kent Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lawson v. Curn
as 7:2021cv00631
Plaintiff:
Roger Lawson
Defendant:
Larry Curn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiting v. Armourtrout
as 7:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
Roger Darnell Whiting
Defendant:
Armourtrout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers et al v. SelectQuote Insurance Services Inc.
as 7:2021cv00603
Plaintiff:
Joanne Rogers and Angela Star Davis
Defendant:
SelectQuote Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
