Cases 51 - 60 of 106
GODIN, JR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41871
Plaintiff:
ROMEO W. GODIN, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BATIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31385
Plaintiff:
ROMEO L. BATIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CALINDAS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABLITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31427
Plaintiff:
ROMEO N. CALINDAS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABLITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LU et al v. LANDIS et al
as 2:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LU and RED ZONE LLC
Defendant:
JOSEPH LANDIS , TINA LANDIS , CR & JL ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUINGUA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56958
Plaintiff:
ROMEO N. QUINGUA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GARCIA et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2010cv80955
Plaintiff:
LUCY G. GARCIA , MONICO G. GARCIA , LILLIAN GALINDO and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS , CELOTEX CORPORATION and OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAYLOGA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41264
Plaintiff:
ROMEO D. FAYLOGA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MARAYA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41603
Plaintiff:
ROMEO A. MARAYA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ROSARIO v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41391
Plaintiff:
ROMEO O ROSARIO
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COOLEY v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2010cv00185
Petitioner:
ROMEO COOLEY
Respondent:
M. BROOKS, SOBINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
