Cases 51 - 56 of 56
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for ABFC 2006-OPT3 Trust, ABFC Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-OPT3 v. Johnson
as 4:2008cv00456
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for ABFC 2006-OPT3 Trust, ABFC Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-OPT3
Defendant:
Angela C. Johnson and Troy S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JOHNSON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00209
Plaintiff:
JEFF S JOHNSON and LENNA JOHNSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCINTYRE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv73957
Plaintiff:
CLEO MCINTYRE, ALICE S. JOHNSON, WAYNE MCINTYRE and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv67430
Plaintiff:
MARGARET S. JOHNSON and MARGARET S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON v. SWEET et al
as 2:2007cv02224
Plaintiff:
LEE S. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
B. A. SWEET and THE U.S. POSTAL INSPECTION TASK FORCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62805
Plaintiff:
EDWARD S. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO., HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., UNIROYAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
