Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Walton v. Kernan
as 2:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Joshua Walton
Defendant:
S. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Kernan et al
as 3:2016cv07103
Defendant:
S. Kernan and J. Beard
Plaintiff:
David Scott Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey M. Daniels v. S. Kernan et al
as 2:2016cv07178
Defendant:
M. Buechter, M. Buechter, X. Cano and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Daniels
Steven Deon Turner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2016cv06764
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, X. Cano, X. Cano and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Deon Turner, Jr
Wilson v. Lesane et al
as 2:2016cv01795
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Larry Lesane, Michael C Smith, Jacob Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Kernan et al
as 3:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Riley
Defendant:
S Kernan, W. L. Montgomery, B. Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Kernan et al
as 2:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Riley
Defendant:
S. Kernan, W. L. Montgomery, B. Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 1:2014at00950
Plaintiff:
Sean Baptiste Neal
Defendant:
Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, S. Kernan , Kern Valley State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 1:2014cv02067
Plaintiff:
Sean Baptiste Neal
Defendant:
Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, S. Kernan , Kern Valley State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph Glynn v. CDCR, et al
as 12-17094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH E. GLYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, M. CATE, Secretary, G. BROWN, Governor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
