Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Taylor v. AAA Service Plumbing LLC
as 1:2026cv02474
Plaintiff:
Tashina Taylor
Defendant:
AAA Service Plumbing LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brandt (PS) v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2026cv02309
Plaintiff:
Eric Patrick Brandt
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Cecilia Kear, Steve Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shadden (PS) v. Gartin et al
as 1:2026cv02319
Defendant:
Terrell Gartin, Terrell Ellis (LC) and Colorado Legal Services
Plaintiff:
William Shadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 1:2026cv02215
Plaintiff:
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Employment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.