Cases 51 - 60 of 4,059
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Wellpath, Jermaine White, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cardwell v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Duval F. Cardwell
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Major Mitchell, Major Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01468
Plaintiff:
Lionesha Diana Smith
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Chris Carr, Danielle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddux and Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Folsom et al
as 1:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Lionesha-Diana Smith and Lionesha Smith
Defendant:
D. Bradley Folsom, Clarke, Moore, DuVall & Rodgers and Renasant Bank
Cause Of Action: 28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
