Cases 51 - 60 of 119
Woodlin v. Warden et al
as 8:2018cv02569
Defendant:
Warden, Nurses, Practictoners and others
Plaintiff:
John Woodlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Welshons v. Baltimore City Correctional Center et al
as 8:2018cv02467
Defendant:
Correctional Officers, Baltimore City Correctional Center and Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Matthews Welshons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bridgeford v. Ruff et al
as 8:2018cv02471
Defendant:
Staff Doggett, Gary Ruff and Staff Forster
Plaintiff:
Douglass Bridgeford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bridgeford v. Ruff et al
as 8:2018cv02388
Defendant:
Staff Doggett, Staff Ruff, Committment and Classification - M.C.I.J. and others
Plaintiff:
Douglass Bridgeford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2018cv02284
Defendant:
Nurse Macanda, Governer Lawrance Hogan, Drumberger and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv01833
Plaintiff:
Marvin Jones
Defendant:
Smith, Daddysman, E. Nilond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. United States Attorney Offices et al
as 1:2018cv00725
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Defendant:
United States Attorney Offices, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and Freedom of International Act and Privacy Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Anne Arundel County Detention Center Medical Unit Staff et al
as 8:2018cv00696
Plaintiff:
Allen L. Bruce
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County Detention Center Medical Unit Staff and C.C.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2018cv00833
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Sheri Passrell, Stelious Vantelas, Ame Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Wexford Medical and Staff et al
as 1:2018cv00394
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bishop, Sr
Defendant:
Wexford Medical and Staff and Wexford Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
