Cases 51 - 60 of 605
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Petitioner:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and State of Alaska
Amicus Curiae:
Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, Mary Sattler Peltola and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Water Users Association, et al
as 23-15499
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant:
U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
KLAMATH TRIBES and KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant:
OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Irrigation District, et al
as 23-15521
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant:
U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
KLAMATH TRIBES
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant:
OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Conservation Council for Hawaii v. National Marine Fisheries Service
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Conservation Council for Hawaii and Michael Nakachi
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Gina Raimondo
Intervenor Defendant:
Hawaii Longline Association
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
State of Alaska v. National Marine Fisheries Service
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
State of Alaska
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv00980
Defendant:
GINA M. RAIMONDO, JANET COIT, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1801 Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA)
A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc., et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 23-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc., Southern Offshore Fishing Association, Inc. and Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Shareholders' Alliance
Defendant / Appellee:
Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Marine Fisheries Service
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Coastal Conservation Association and State of Louisiana
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC. v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, JANET COIT and others
Intervenor Defendant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Def of Wildlife v. U.S. Army Corps
as 23-60033
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Defenders of Wildlife and Healthy Gulf
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries Service and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Louisiana State v. NOAA
as 22-30799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Louisiana State, by and through Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
Defendant / Appellee:
National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Richard Spinrad, Administrator, Chris Oliver, In His Official Capacity as Assistant Administrator For Fisheries, Samuel D. Rauch, III, In His Official Capacity as Deputy Assistant Administrator For Regulatory Programs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
