Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Portillo v. Tientcheu et al
as 3:2019cv01254
Defendant:
Giorno Tientcheu and Uber Technologies Inc
Plaintiff:
Yovanny Portillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arunachalam v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 5:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Revolar Technology Inc v. Uber Technologies Inc
as 2:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
Revolar Technology Inc
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Fall Line Patents, LLC
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TSI USA LLC v. Uber Technologies Inc
as 3:2016cv02177
Plaintiff:
TSI USA LLC
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. Ericsson, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00618
Plaintiff:
Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd.
Defendant:
Ericsson, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., Ericsson Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd., Artek Surfin Chemicals, Ltd. (d/b/a Galata Chemicals, LLC), Ubisoft Studio, Inc. (d/b/a Ubisoft) and others
Intervenor:
Ramey & Schwaller, LLP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00631
Plaintiff:
Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Cubria v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00544
Plaintiff:
Melissa Cubria
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Swink v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01092
Plaintiff:
Ryan Swink
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Travis Kalanick
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
