Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Sneed v. Wheeler Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
James Sneed
Defendant:
Wheeler Correctional Facility and Jason Medlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Bishop et al
as 3:2014cv00419
Respondent:
Sheila Aubry, Bishop, Jaccobs and others
Petitioner:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eddie Jinks v. Warden
as 14-12005
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE LEE JINKS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Wheeler Correctional Facility
Richardson v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Walter C. Richardson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Wheeler Correctional Facility, Jason D. Medlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaguski v. Medlin et al
as 3:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Shawn Gaguski
Defendant:
Jack Medlin, FNU Kowalkowski, Wheeler Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. MEDLIN et al
as 5:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
WILLIE FRANK WRIGHT, JR
Defendant:
JASON MEDLIN, CALDWELL, CASEY WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
BRUCE WILLIAM MARTIN
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, BUTTS, FOLKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampson v. Bess et al
as 3:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Erick Javotney Sampson
Defendant:
Jerry Bess, Wheeler Correctional Facility, J. D. Meldin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIMS v. TELFAIR STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
REGINALD D MIMS
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison and Wheeler Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MIMS v. TELFAIR STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2012cv00483
Plaintiff:
REGINALD D MIMS
Defendant:
TELFAIR STATE PRISON and WHEELER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
