Cases 51 - 60 of 14,879
TAMARA WAREKA p/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS v. PLANO PLASTIC SURGERY, P.A. et al
as 4:2024cv00780
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, inclusive and PLANO PLASTIC SURGERY, P.A.
Plaintiff:
TAMARA WAREKA p/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Williams v. Onwuchekwa et al
as 6:2024cv00303
Defendant:
Ezenwanyi Onwuchekwa, Mary Gorter and Unknown Dorety
Plaintiff:
James D Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Coalston et al
as 6:2024cv00427
Defendant:
Jennifer Coalston and Autumn D. Gerfer
Plaintiff:
Ivan William Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalley v. Sekula et al
as 1:2024cv00997
Defendant:
Robert Zearfoss, Sherri Pieniazek, Mark Sekula and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Sean Dalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Simmons v. Ford, et al
as 6:2024cv00436
Defendant:
William Torres and Dillion Ford
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00190
Defendant:
RGB Hospitality, Inc., Emiliano Martinez, Marriott International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shac'quon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore et al v. Palmer
as 1:2024cv00341
Defendant:
William H Palmer, III
Plaintiff:
David Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Williams v. Apple Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Williams
Defendant:
Google LLC and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00943
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Horton et al
as 7:2024cv00116
Defendant:
Detective William Norris, Detective FNU Robertson and Sheriff Sidney Horton
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
