Cases 51 - 60 of 3,909
Douglas v. Tangney et al
as 3:2024cv02801
Plaintiff:
Dalton Douglas
Defendant:
Jeffrey Tangney, Anna Bryson, Regina Benjamin, M.D. and others
United States of America v. April et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathleen April, Arthur E. Bailey, James M. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Shaya v. Nofs et al
as 2:2024cv10670
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Shaya
Defendant:
Kylie Nofs, Zhu Shicai, Luo Yanbing and others
Intervenor:
Alt 5 Sigma Canada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Chen et al v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv03349
Plaintiff:
Ting Chen and Xin Yang
Defendant:
Yu Chen, Yurong Hu, A Fei and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
TV Tokyo Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02294
Plaintiff:
TV Tokyo Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, aizhimimaoyiyouxia, ANLANGGO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Hatcher v. Yang et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hatcher
Defendant:
Sylvain Yang and Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
