Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 609
Western Energy Alliance et al v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Defendant: United States Department of Interior Secretary, Deb Haaland and United States Bureau of Land Management
Petitioner: Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Intervenor: Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Respondent: Bureau of Land Management Director
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
State of Wyoming v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2023cv00193
Respondent: United States Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Petitioner: State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act
Savelkoul v. Wormuth
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff: Joshua D. Savelkoul
Defendant: Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
PacifiCorp v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff: PacifiCorp
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
State of Wyoming v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Plaintiff: State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Acosta v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv00758
Plaintiff: Ruth Griselda Acosta
Defendant: US Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Aero Tech, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior
as 2:2023cv00726
Plaintiff: Aero Tech, Inc.
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Drew v. United States Postal Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00900
Plaintiff: Courtney S Drew
Defendant: United States Postal Service, Thomas J Blum, Bernadette Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Garfield County, Utah, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4106
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner: GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Dalton, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4107
Plaintiff / Appellant: ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Plaintiff: GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner: GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?