Cases 51 - 60 of 17,663
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Crosby and Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norman v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Marcell Jeron Norman
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00407
Petitioner:
Turischevia J Harris
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Mable Bassett Correctional Center and Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Czajkowski (PS) v. Roybal et al
as 1:2024cv00548
Petitioner:
Conrad J. Czajkowski
Respondent:
Joe Roybal, Kim Karn and Ainsile Neubert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold (PS) v. Shuster et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
David Ray Arnold
Respondent:
Doug Shuster, Colorado Department of Corrections Director, CDOC Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross (ID 116253) v. Williams
as 5:2024cv03031
Petitioner:
Michael C. Ross
Respondent:
Thomas L. Williams and Don Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone (PS) v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Petitioner:
Dale S. Stone and Dale S. Garcia
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruner v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Jamele R Bruner
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
