Cases 51 - 60 of 8,267
21st Mortgage Corporation v. Bender et al
as 7:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Neil Carmichael Bender, II, Matthew W Ring, Abbott Park MHC LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brooks v. Golden Corral Corporation
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Christie Brooks
Defendant:
Golden Corral Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Origin Food Group, LLC v. Luthman Backlund Foods USA, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Origin Food Group, LLC
Defendant:
Luthman Blacklund Foods USA, Inc. and Luthman Backlund Foods USA, Inc.
Superior Skilled Trades, LLC v. Joseph Aaron Mason
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Superior Skilled Trades, LLC
Defendant:
Joseph Aaron Mason
Sky Zip, LLC v. Lux Entertainment, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Sky Zip, LLC
Defendant:
Lux Entertainment, LLC and Michael Sina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HJHN PROPERTIES, LLC v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANIES
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
HJHN PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ROGERS v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
rodney rogers
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Capiau v. Ascendum Machinery, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Brian Capiau
Defendant:
Ascendum Machinery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
SOELECT INC. v. REDEX SAS
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
SOELECT INC.
Defendant:
Redex SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Nuruddin v. CarMax, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Sikander Nuruddin
Defendant:
CarMax, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
