Cases 51 - 60 of 22,767
Langworthy v. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
as 4:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Reyna et.al.
as 3:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Johnson and Mr. James C Johnson
Defendant:
Renee C. Reyna and San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Austin v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc., Epiq Global, Susan Illston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Sequoia Benefits and Insurance Services LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01363
Plaintiff:
Justice Smith
Defendant:
Sequoia Benefits and Insurance Services LLC, Greg Golub and Spencer Persson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Irvine et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Parmindar Irvine and Michael Irvine
Defendant:
State of California, County of Contra Costa and City of Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
