Cases 51 - 60 of 166,588
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bolling v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Desi Eugene Bolling
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins v. Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institution
as 8:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Alfonzo Damien Adkins
Respondent:
Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cooper v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Jamell M. Cooper
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knutson v. Carlton
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Robin Knutson
Defendant:
FNU Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garrafa v. Lola RWM Inc et al
as 8:2024cv01119
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Garrafa
Defendant:
Lola RWM Inc doing business as Little Owl Learning Academy and Lorainne Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carallo v. Axogen Corporation
as 8:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Chauna Carallo
Defendant:
Axogen Corporation
ROSEMARY v. BESTBET HOLDINGS, INC.
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
QUINN ROSEMARY
Defendant:
BESTBET HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
