Cases 51 - 60 of 3,939
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bole v. Oldham County Board of Education
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Suzette Bole
Defendant:
Oldham County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harmon et al v. Goodwin et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
I. H., S. H., Teresa M. Harmon and others
Defendant:
Hon. Lori Goodwin, Stephanie Willis, David Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Vowels v. State of Kentucky et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, Gene Snyder Federal Building, United States District Court West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Toon v. Spann et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Steven Glen Toon
Defendant:
Officer Michael Andrew Spann, Officer Jonathan Sholar and The City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Gerstle v. Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Zoe Gerstle
Defendant:
Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance, Sherrell Clay and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
