Cases 51 - 60 of 17,751
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2024cv01609
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
Julie Lynch, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, Frederick D Benton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bogle v. USA
as 3:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Crawford P. Bogle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Foster v. Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Christopher Foster
Defendant:
Ohio and Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Cronie Lloyd
Respondent:
Acting Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manning v. Henry
as 3:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
DeAmontae Manning
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Christopher Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Moraitis et al.
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Bernard Hogan
Defendant:
Stavros Moraitis and City of Toledo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bugno v. Hunsinger
as 4:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Alex Bugno
Respondent:
Warden Angela Hunsinger-Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silver v. Jecubic et al.
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Terrell L. Silver
Defendant:
Sergeant Mr. Jecubic, Executive Cuyahoga County and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stallworth v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Gerald Stallworth
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
